The Biospectrum Horizons: A Journal of Life Science Research (JASLSRI) follows a rigorous and transparent double-blind peer review process to uphold academic quality, originality, and ethical publishing standards. This process ensures impartial evaluation and promotes excellence in life science research.

Overview of the Review Process

• All manuscripts undergo an initial editorial screening for scope, originality, ethical compliance, and formatting.
• Eligible manuscripts are assigned to at least two independent expert reviewers under a double-blind review system.
• Reviewers evaluate scientific merit, novelty, methodology, clarity, and ethical soundness.
• Based on reviewer recommendations, the Editor-in-Chief may:
  • Accept the manuscript (with or without minor revisions),
  • Request major revisions and resubmission,
  • Reject the manuscript.
• The final publication decision rests solely with the Editor-in-Chief.

Duration of Review

• The average peer review period is 4–6 weeks from reviewer assignment.
• Authors are promptly informed of editorial decisions and revision timelines.
• JASLSRI prioritizes both efficiency and thorough academic evaluation.

Reviewer Responsibilities

• Provide objective, constructive, and detailed feedback to improve manuscript quality.
• Evaluate submissions without bias related to author identity, institution, or nationality.
• Disclose any conflicts of interest before accepting review assignments.
• Maintain strict confidentiality and avoid misuse of unpublished data.

Ethical Considerations

• The review process strictly follows COPE ethical guidelines.
• Suspected plagiarism, data manipulation, or misconduct is reported to the Editor-in-Chief.
• Appropriate actions are taken in accordance with journal ethics policies.

Post-Review Communication

• Authors receive detailed reviewer comments after evaluation.
• A point-by-point response to reviewer suggestions is required for revisions.
• Revised manuscripts may be re-evaluated by original reviewers to ensure quality.